Add Editor crash course (#385)

Co-authored-by: rubenwardy <rw@rubenwardy.com>
master
wsor4035 2022-08-01 08:02:16 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3be937c503
commit c0447cdcd2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 26 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -15,8 +15,9 @@ Editors should make sure they are familiar with the
## ContentDB is not a curated platform
It's important to note that ContentDB isn't a curated platform, but it also does have some
requirements on minimum usefulness. See 2.2 in the [Policy and Guidance](/policy_and_guidance/).
It's important to note that ContentDB isn't a curated platform - a mod doesn't need to be good
to be accepted, but there are some minimum requirements when it comes to usefulness and other things.
See 2.2 in the [Policy and Guidance](/policy_and_guidance/).
## Editor Work Queue
@ -32,3 +33,26 @@ The [Editor Work Queue](/todo/) and related pages contain useful information for
Editors currently receive notifications for any new thread opened on a package, so that they
know when a user is asking for help. These notifications are shown separately in the notifications
interface, and can be configured separately in Emails and Notifications.
## Crash Course to being an Editor
The [Package Inclusion Policy and Guidance](/policy_and_guidance/) is our go to resource for making decisions in
changes needed, similar to how lua_api.txt is the doc for modders to consult.
In the [Editor console](/todo/), the two most important tabs are the Editor Work Queue and the Forum
Topics tab. Primarily you will be focusing on the Editor Work Queue tab, where a list of packages to review is.
When you have some free time, feel free to scroll through the Forum Topics page and import mods into ContentDB.
But don't import a mod if it's broken, outdated, not that useful, or not worth importing - click Discard instead.
A simplified process for reviewing a package is as follows:
1. scan the package image if present for any obvious closed source assets.
2. if right to a name warning is present, check its validity and if the package meets
the exceptions.
3. if the forums topic missing warning is present, feel free to check it, but its
usually incorrect.
4. check source, etc links to make sure they work and are correct.
5. verify that the package has license file that matches what is on the contentdb fields
6. verify that all assets and code are licensed correctly
7. if the above steps pass, approve the package, else request changes needed from the author